1 How Do Things Look to the Color-blind?
نویسنده
چکیده
Our question is, how do things look to the color-blind? But what does that mean? Who are the “color-blind”? Approximately 7 percent of males and fewer than 1 percent of females (of European descent) have some form of inherited defect of color vision and as a result are unable to discriminate some colored stimuli that most of us can tell apart. (Color defective is an alternative term that is often used; we will continue to speak with the vulgar.) Color-vision defects constitute a spectrum of disorders with varying degrees and types of departure from normal human color vision. One form of color-vision defect is dichromacy: by mixing together only two lights, the dichromat can match any light, unlike normal trichromatic humans, who need to mix three. The most common form of dichromacy (afflicting about 2 percent of males) is red-green color blindness, or red-green dichromacy, which itself comes in two varieties. A redgreen dichromat will not be able to distinguish some pairs of stimuli that respectively appear red and green to those with normal color vision. For simplicity, we will concentrate almost exclusively on red-green color blindness. In a philosophical context, our question is liable to be taken in two ways. First, it can be straightforwardly taken as a question about visible properties of external objects, like tomatoes. Do tomatoes look colored to dichromats? If so, what color? Second, it may be interpreted as the more elusive—although closely related—question of “what it’s like” to be color-blind. Forget about tomatoes—what is a dichromat’s experience like? This chapter addresses the first question and, for reasons of space, does not explicitly address the second. Put another (arguably equivalent) way, we are asking what colors are represented by a dichromat’s experience. Having now identified the “color-blind,” and the straightforward way in which our question should be taken, a further point of clarification might be helpful. Imagine a bright blue car parked in an underground garage illuminated by orange lighting. Bright blue objects under this lighting look quite distinctive. Those accustomed to the garage
منابع مشابه
Spraying color Hilbert 1
What is color? Of course, examples of colorful objects are not hard to come by (Fig. 1 provides numerous examples), so the question itself is slightly puzzling, suggesting that some confusion needs to be cleared up or ignorance enlightened. But how could anyone (who isn't blind or totally lacking in color vision) possibly be confused about what color is? After all, if we learn anything about th...
متن کاملRelativism and Disagreement
It has often been proposed that claims about what is funny, delicious, or likely are “subjective,” in the sense that their truth depends not only on how things are with the objects they explicitly concern, but on how things are with some subject not explicitly mentioned. This thought is supported by the striking degree to which we differ in our judgements about these matters. If there are wholl...
متن کاملP14: How to Find a Talent?
Talents may be artistic or technical, mental or physical, personal or social. You can be a talented introvert or a talented extrovert. Learning to look for your talents in the right places and building those talents into skills and abilities might take some work, but going about it creatively will let you explore your natural abilities and find your innate talents. You’re not going to fin...
متن کاملجور دیگر دیدن پژوهشی در پیوند عرفان و هنر
Seeing things differently, as discussed in this paper, is the link between Sufism and art. It is a quality shared by both Sufis and artists. This quality has two dimensions: the dimension of insight and the dimension of actions. With their insights, artists and Sufis see the world differently. They see things that others do not see. They also see things that everybody else sees in different way...
متن کاملInattentional Blindness: An Overview By Arien Mack & Irvin Rock
What is the relationship between attention and perception? How much, if anything, of our visual world do we perceive when we are not attending to it? Are there only some kinds of things we see when we are not attending? If there are, do they fall into particular categories? Do we see them because they have captured our attention or because our perception of them is independent of our attention?...
متن کامل